Decoding the Mystery: How to Interpret Regression Output in R Like a Champ
Want to share your content on R-bloggers? click here if you have a blog, or here if you don't.
Introduction
Ever run an R regression and stared at the output, feeling like you’re deciphering an ancient scroll? Fear not, fellow data enthusiasts! Today, we’ll crack the code and turn those statistics into meaningful insights.
Let’s grab our trusty R arsenal and set up the scene:
- Dataset:
mtcars(a classic car dataset in R) - Regression: Linear model with
mpgas the dependent variable (miles per gallon) and all other variables as independent variables (predictors)
Step 1: Summon the Stats Gods with “summary()”
First, cast your R spell with summary(lm(mpg ~ ., data = mtcars)). This incantation conjures a table of coefficients, p-values, and other stats. Don’t panic if it looks like a cryptic riddle! We’ll break it down:
model <- lm(mpg ~ ., data = mtcars) summary(model)
Call:
lm(formula = mpg ~ ., data = mtcars)
Residuals:
Min 1Q Median 3Q Max
-3.4506 -1.6044 -0.1196 1.2193 4.6271
Coefficients:
Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|)
(Intercept) 12.30337 18.71788 0.657 0.5181
cyl -0.11144 1.04502 -0.107 0.9161
disp 0.01334 0.01786 0.747 0.4635
hp -0.02148 0.02177 -0.987 0.3350
drat 0.78711 1.63537 0.481 0.6353
wt -3.71530 1.89441 -1.961 0.0633 .
qsec 0.82104 0.73084 1.123 0.2739
vs 0.31776 2.10451 0.151 0.8814
am 2.52023 2.05665 1.225 0.2340
gear 0.65541 1.49326 0.439 0.6652
carb -0.19942 0.82875 -0.241 0.8122
---
Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
Residual standard error: 2.65 on 21 degrees of freedom
Multiple R-squared: 0.869, Adjusted R-squared: 0.8066
F-statistic: 13.93 on 10 and 21 DF, p-value: 3.793e-07
Coefficients
These tell you how much, on average, the dependent variable changes for a one-unit increase in the corresponding independent variable (holding other variables constant). For example, a coefficient of 0.05 for cyl means for every one more cylinder, mpg is expected to increase by 0.05 miles per gallon, on average.
model$coefficients
(Intercept) cyl disp hp drat wt
12.30337416 -0.11144048 0.01333524 -0.02148212 0.78711097 -3.71530393
qsec vs am gear carb
0.82104075 0.31776281 2.52022689 0.65541302 -0.19941925
P-values
These whisper secrets about significance. A p-value less than 0.05 (like for wt!) means the observed relationship between the variable and mpg is unlikely to be due to chance. The following are the individual p-values for each variable:
summary(model)$coefficients[, 4]
(Intercept) cyl disp hp drat wt
0.51812440 0.91608738 0.46348865 0.33495531 0.63527790 0.06325215
qsec vs am gear carb
0.27394127 0.88142347 0.23398971 0.66520643 0.81217871
Now the overall p-value for the model:
model_p <- function(.model) {
# Get p-values
fstat <- summary(.model)$fstatistic
p <- pf(fstat[1], fstat[2], fstat[3], lower.tail = FALSE)
print(p)
}
model_p(.model = model)
value 3.793152e-07
Step 2: Let’s Talk Turkey - Interpreting the Numbers
Coefficients
Think of them as slopes. A positive coefficient means the dependent variable increases with the independent variable. Negative? The opposite! For example, disp has a negative coefficient, so bigger engines (larger displacement) tend to have lower mpg.
P-values
Imagine a courtroom. A low p-value is like a strong witness, convincing you the relationship between the variables is real. High p-values (like for am!) are like unreliable witnesses, leaving us unsure.
Step 3: Zoom Out - The Bigger Picture
R-squared
This tells you how well the model explains the variation in mpg. A value close to 1 is fantastic, while closer to 0 means the model needs work. In our case, it’s not bad, but there’s room for improvement.
summary(model)$r.squared
[1] 0.8690158
Residuals
These are the differences between the actual mpg values and the model’s predictions. Analyzing them can reveal hidden patterns and model issues.
data.frame(model$residuals)
model.residuals Mazda RX4 -1.599505761 Mazda RX4 Wag -1.111886079 Datsun 710 -3.450644085 Hornet 4 Drive 0.162595453 Hornet Sportabout 1.006565971 Valiant -2.283039036 Duster 360 -0.086256253 Merc 240D 1.903988115 Merc 230 -1.619089898 Merc 280 0.500970058 Merc 280C -1.391654392 Merc 450SE 2.227837890 Merc 450SL 1.700426404 Merc 450SLC -0.542224699 Cadillac Fleetwood -1.634013415 Lincoln Continental -0.536437711 Chrysler Imperial 4.206370638 Fiat 128 4.627094192 Honda Civic 0.503261089 Toyota Corolla 4.387630904 Toyota Corona -2.143103442 Dodge Challenger -1.443053221 AMC Javelin -2.532181498 Camaro Z28 -0.006021976 Pontiac Firebird 2.508321011 Fiat X1-9 -0.993468693 Porsche 914-2 -0.152953961 Lotus Europa 2.763727417 Ford Pantera L -3.070040803 Ferrari Dino 0.006171846 Maserati Bora 1.058881618 Volvo 142E -2.968267683
Bonus Tip: Visualize the data! Scatter plots and other graphs can make relationships between variables pop.
Remember: Interpreting regression output is an art, not a science. Use your domain knowledge, consider the context, and don’t hesitate to explore further!
So next time you face regression output, channel your inner R wizard and remember:
- Coefficients whisper about slopes and changes.
- P-values tell tales of significance, true or false.
- R-squared unveils the model’s explanatory magic.
- Residuals hold hidden clues, waiting to be discovered.
With these tools in your belt, you’ll be interpreting regression output like a pro in no time! Now go forth and conquer the data, fellow R adventurers!
Note: This is just a brief example. For a deeper dive, explore specific diagnostics, model selection techniques, and other advanced topics to truly master the art of regression interpretation.
R-bloggers.com offers daily e-mail updates about R news and tutorials about learning R and many other topics. Click here if you're looking to post or find an R/data-science job.
Want to share your content on R-bloggers? click here if you have a blog, or here if you don't.