[This article was first published on R on Alan Yeung, and kindly contributed to R-bloggers]. (You can report issue about the content on this page here)
Want to share your content on R-bloggers? click here if you have a blog, or here if you don't.
Want to share your content on R-bloggers? click here if you have a blog, or here if you don't.
This blog post is just a note that when you try to do a grouped summary of a date variable but some groups have all missing values, it will return Inf
. This means that the summary will not show up as an NA
and this can cause issues in analysis if you are not careful.
library(tidyverse) df <- tibble::tribble( ~id, ~dt, 1L, "01/01/2001", 1L, NA, 2L, NA, 2L, NA ) %>% mutate(dt = dmy(dt)) z1 <- df %>% group_by(id) %>% summarise(dt_min = min(dt, na.rm = TRUE), .groups = "drop") z1 # A tibble: 2 × 2 # id dt_min # <int> <date> # 1 1 2001-01-01 # 2 2 Inf sum(is.na(z1$dt_min)) # [1] 0
There are a couple of ways around this. Firstly you can use an if()
statement.
z2 <- df %>% group_by(id) %>% summarise(dt_min = if (all(is.na(dt))) NA_Date_ else min(dt, na.rm = TRUE), .groups = "drop") z2 # A tibble: 2 × 2 # id dt_min # <int> <date> # 1 1 2001-01-01 # 2 2 NA sum(is.na(z2$dt_min)) # [1] 1
Or you can summary functions from the hablar
package.
z3 <- df %>% group_by(id) %>% summarise(dt_min = hablar::min_(dt), .groups = "drop") z3 # A tibble: 2 × 2 # id dt_min # <int> <date> # 1 1 2001-01-01 # 2 2 NA sum(is.na(z3$dt_min)) # [1] 1
Is there a reason why R decides to return Inf
when summarising dates? Are there any other solutions to summarising date variables that contain missing values? Leave me a comment if you know thanks.
To leave a comment for the author, please follow the link and comment on their blog: R on Alan Yeung.
R-bloggers.com offers daily e-mail updates about R news and tutorials about learning R and many other topics. Click here if you're looking to post or find an R/data-science job.
Want to share your content on R-bloggers? click here if you have a blog, or here if you don't.