Shuffling Columns: Pandas is Competitive‽

Last year I benchmarked a few ways of shuffling columns in a data.table, but what about pandas? I didn’t know, so let’s revisit those tests and add a few more operations! pandas winds up being much more competitive than I expected.

First, dplyr is by far the slowest. Second, pandas is (more than) competitive with the R options. In the small-size regime (vector sizes up to about 1,000), the pandas option is similar to, but faster than, most of the slower R options, and the numpy-backed solution is nearly as fast as base R assignment and data.table’s in-place option. I expected pandas to be a lot slower.

More surprising, in the large-vector regime both Python solutions outperform all R options, and the in-place Python option is much faster than everything else, starting with vector sizes of about 10,000. I’m not sure how representative this benchmark is, but it’s an interesting data point.

More than most frameworks, pandas feels sensitive to the way we do something: calling .apply() isn’t just a little slower than .transform()—it’s miles slower. So the simple transformations we’re doing here are pretty easy to optimize; and numpy-backed operations should be fast anyway.

There also might be systematic differences between R and Python tests: R functions are tested using microbenchmark and Python tests were run with timeit. New code is below.

---

< details> < summary>New Python testing code

from timeit import Timer
import pandas as pd

def scramble_naive(df: pd.DataFrame, colname: str) -> pd.DataFrame:
    df[colname] = df[colname].sample(frac=1, ignore_index=True)
    return df

test_naive = "scramble_naive(df, colname='x')"

results_naive = {
    n: Timer(test_naive, setup % n).repeat(repeat=100, number=1)
    for n in range(21)
}

The timeit module reports its times in seconds (cf. nanoseconds for microbenchmark), so we need a conversion factor to make the times comparable.

---

import numpy as np
import pandas as pd

def scramble_inplace(df: pd.DataFrame, colname: str) -> pd.DataFrame:
    np.random.shuffle(df[colname].to_numpy())
    return df

test_inplace = "scramble_naive(df, colname='x')"

results_inplace = {
    n: Timer(test_inplace, setup % n).repeat(repeat=100, number=1)
    for n in range(21)
}

 

< details> < summary>New R testing code

scramble_base <- function(input_df, colname) {
  input_df[[colname]] <- sample(input_df[[colname]])
  input_df
}

---

library(dplyr)

scramble_dplyr <- function(input_tbl, colname) {
  input_tbl %>% mutate({{colname}} := sample(.data[[colname]]))
}

This dplyr example is probably penalized a bit because I’m passing column names as strings.

---

---

This post is kindly republished by R-bloggers.