Introduction

A colleague (and friend) of mine recently published a research paper titled “EpiLPS: A fast and flexible Bayesian tool for estimation of the time-varying reproduction number” in PLoS Computational Biology.

I am not used to share papers for which I have not contributed to. Nonetheless, I would like to do an exception with this one as I strongly believe that the method developed in the paper deserves to be known, in particular for anyone working in epidemiology.

Below, the motivation behind the paper, together with an illustration on simulated and real data (US hospitalization data). More information can be found in the paper and in the accompanying website.

Motivation

EpiLPS (Gressani et al. 2022) is a methodology for flexible Bayesian inference of the time-varying reproduction number \(\mathcal{R}_t\); the average number of secondary cases generated by an infected agent at time \(t\). This is a key epidemiological parameter that informs about the transmission potential of an infectious disease and can be used by public health authorities to gauge the effectiveness of interventions and propose an orientation for future control strategies.

This metric has gained in popularity during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic with wide media coverage as its meaning is easily and intuitively grasped. Put simply, when \(\mathcal{R} < 1\), the signal is encouraging as the epidemic is under control and will eventually vanish. On the contrary, a value of \(\mathcal{R} > 1\) means that the disease keeps spreading and infections are witnessing an expansionary impact. Having a robust and reliable tool to compute the reproduction number from infectious disease data is therefore crucial.

A group of researchers in the EpiPose team from Hasselt University (Belgium), Leiden University (The Netherlands), and the University of Bern (Switzerland) have recently developed a new methodology for estimating the instantaneous reproduction number from incidence time series data for a given serial interval distribution (the time elapsed between the onset of symptoms in an infector and the onset of symptoms of secondary cases). They termed their approach EpiLPS for “Epidemiological modeling with Laplacian-P–Splines” as Laplace approximations and P-splines smoothers are key ingredients that form the backbone of the proposed methodology.

The EpiLPS model assumes that the observed reported cases (by reporting date or date of symptom onset) are governed by a negative binomial distribution. As such, it allows to take the feature of overdispersion into account, contrary to a Poisson model. The epidemic curve is smoothed with P-splines (where posterior estimates of latent variables are computed via Laplace approximations) in a first step and a renewal equation model is used in a second step as a bridge between the reproduction number and the estimated spline coefficients through a “plug-in” method.

The authors also explain the main difference between EpiLPS and EpiEstim, a well established approached for estimating \(\mathcal{R}_t\) in real-time developed by (Cori et al. 2013) and make extensive comparisons between the two approaches under different epidemic scenarios.

An interesting feature of EpiLPS is that the user can choose between a fully “sampling-free” path, where model hyperparameters are fixed at their maximum a posteriori (LPSMAP) or a fully stochastic path (LPSMALA) based on a Metropolis-adjusted Langevin algorithm (LPSMALA). Talking about efficiency, routines for Laplace approximations and B-splines evaluations have been coded in C++ and integrated in R via the Rcpp package, so that the underlying algorithm can be executed in negligible time.

Below, we provide a short example of how to use the EpiLPS routines to estimate \(\mathcal{R}_t\).

Getting started

The EpiLPS package is available from CRAN (see https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/EpiLPS/index.html) and can be installed from the R console by typing:

install.packages("EpiLPS")

The package can then be loaded as follows:

library("EpiLPS")

The EpiLPS package structure is fairly simple as it consists in a few routines:

• The function epilps() is the core routine for fitting the reproduction number.
• With plot.epilps(), the user can plot the estimated epidemic curve and \(\mathcal{R}_t\).
• Finally, two ancillary routines, episim() and perfcheck() have been developed to essentially reproduce the simulation results of the associated paper.

A simulated example

A set of epidemic data can be simulated with the episim() routine by specifying a serial interval distribution and by choosing among a set of available patterns for the true reproduction number curve (here we choose pattern number 5 corresponding to a rather wiggly curve).

The simulated outbreak is for a duration of 40 days as specified in the endepi option. By setting the option plotsim = TRUE, the routine returns a figure summarizing the incidence time series, a bar plot for the specified serial interval distribution and the true underlying reproduction number curve.

set.seed(1234)

SI <- c(0.344, 0.316, 0.168, 0.104, 0.068)
simepidemic <- episim(
  serial_interval = SI,
  Rpattern = 5,
  plotsim = TRUE,
  verbose = TRUE,
  endepi = 40
)
## Chosen scenario: 5 'Wiggly then stable Rt'.
## Incidence of cases generated from a Poisson distribution. 
## Total number of days of epidemic: 40.

If you want to have an overview of the generated incidence time series, just type:

simepidemic$y
##  [1]  10   6  15  24  37  43  54  46  47  28  20   8  10  10   3   5   3   4   6
## [20]   6  15  21  44  75 135 217 329 409 453 487 457 443 297 290 255 246 246 339
## [39] 395 573

LPSMAP_fit <- epilps(
  incidence = simepidemic$y,
  serial_interval = SI,
  tictoc = TRUE
)
## Inference method chosen: LPSMAP. 
## CI for LPSMAP computed via lognormal posterior approx. of Rt.Total number of days: 40. 
## Mean Rt discarding first 7 days: 1.327.
## Mean 95% CI of Rt discarding first 7 days: (1.164,1.527) 
## Elapsed real time (wall clock time): 0.229 seconds.
LPSMALA_fit <- epilps(
  incidence = simepidemic$y, serial_interval = SI,
  method = "LPSMALA", chain_length = 10000, burn = 4000
)
## Inference method chosen: LPSMALA with chain length 10000 and warmup 4000.
## MCMC acceptance rate: 56.41%. 
## Geweke z-score < 2.33 for:  32 / 33  variables. 
## Total number of days: 40. 
## Mean Rt discarding first 7 days: 1.326.
## Mean 95% CI of Rt discarding first 7 days: (1.117,1.555). 
## Timing of routine not requested.

days <- seq(8, 40)

#--- Smoothed epidemic curve
gridExtra::grid.arrange(
  plot(LPSMALA_fit,
    plotout = "epicurve", incibars = TRUE, themetype = "light",
    epicol = "darkgreen", cicol = rgb(0.3, 0.73, 0.3, 0.2),
    epititle = "Smoothed epidemic curve", titlesize = 13, barwidth = 0.25
  ),

  #--- Estimated reproduction number
  plot(LPSMALA_fit,
    plotout = "rt", theme = "light", rtcol = "black",
    titlesize = 13, Rtitle = "Estimated R (LPSMALA)"
  ),
  nrow = 1, ncol = 2
)

par(mfrow = c(1, 2))

#--- LPSMAP vs target R
plot(days, sapply(days, simepidemic$Rtrue),
  type = "l", lwd = 2, ylim = c(0, 4),
  ylab = "Estimated R", xlab = "Time"
)
polygon(
  x = c(days, rev(days)), y = c(
    LPSMAP_fit$epifit$R95CI_low[8:40],
    rev(LPSMAP_fit$epifit$R95CI_up[8:40])
  ),
  col = rgb(0.23, 0.54, 1, 0.3), border = NA
)
lines(days, LPSMAP_fit$epifit$R_estim[8:40], type = "l", col = "cornflowerblue", lwd = 2)
lines(days, sapply(days, simepidemic$Rtrue), type = "l", lwd = 2)

grid(nx = 10, ny = 10)
legend("topright",
  lty = c(1, 1), lwd = c(2, 2),
  col = c("black", "blue", rgb(0.23, 0.54, 1, 0.3)),
  c("Target R", "LPSMAP", "LPSMAP 95% CI"), bty = "n", cex = 0.9
)

#--- LPSMALA vs target R
plot(days, sapply(days, simepidemic$Rtrue),
  type = "l", lwd = 2, ylim = c(0, 4),
  ylab = "Estimated R", xlab = "Time"
)
polygon(
  x = c(days, rev(days)), y = c(
    LPSMALA_fit$epifit$R95CI_low[8:40],
    rev(LPSMALA_fit$epifit$R95CI_up[8:40])
  ),
  col = rgb(1, 0.23, 0.31, 0.3), border = NA
)
lines(days, LPSMALA_fit$epifit$R_estim[8:40], type = "l", col = "red", lwd = 2)
lines(days, sapply(days, simepidemic$Rtrue), type = "l", lwd = 2)

grid(nx = 10, ny = 10)
legend("topright",
  lty = c(1, 1), lwd = c(2, 2),
  col = c("black", "red", rgb(1, 0.23, 0.31, 0.3)),
  c("Target R", "LPSMALA", "LPSMALA 95% CI"), bty = "n", cex = 0.9
)

# Estimated R of the last week (with LPSMAP)
round(tail(LPSMAP_fit$epifit[, 1:4], 7), 3)
##    Date R_estim R95CI_low R95CI_up
## 34   34   0.708     0.663    0.756
## 35   35   0.724     0.676    0.775
## 36   36   0.809     0.755    0.868
## 37   37   0.971     0.908    1.039
## 38   38   1.205     1.135    1.279
## 39   39   1.461     1.384    1.541
## 40   40   1.671     1.557    1.794
# Estimated mean number of cases of the last week (with LPSMAP)
round(tail(LPSMAP_fit$epifit[, 5:7], 7))
##    mu_estim mu95CI_low mu95CI_up
## 34      284        225       357
## 35      254        202       319
## 36      248        196       312
## 37      267        211       338
## 38      319        253       404
## 39      411        325       520
## 40      552        394       774

USA hospitalization data

To illustrate EpiLPS on real data, we download hospitalization data from the COVID19 package for the USA in the period ranging from 2021-09-01 to 2022-09-01 and apply the epilps() routine to estimate the reproduction number.

install.packages("COVID19")
library("COVID19")
# Get data and specify serial interval distribution
USADat <- COVID19::covid19(
  country = "US", level = 1, start = "2021-09-01",
  end = "2022-09-01", verbose = FALSE
)

si <- c(0.344, 0.316, 0.168, 0.104, 0.068)

inciUSA <- USADat$hosp
dateUSA <- USADat$date

We use the epilps() routine with method LPSMAP (default) and plot the smoothed epidemic curve and the estimated reproduction number with a 95% credible interval.

epifit <- epilps(incidence = inciUSA, serial_interval = si, K = 20)
## Inference method chosen: LPSMAP. 
## CI for LPSMAP computed via lognormal posterior approx. of Rt.Total number of days: 366. 
## Mean Rt discarding first 7 days: 0.994.
## Mean 95% CI of Rt discarding first 7 days: (0.983,1.005) 
## Timing of routine not requested.
gridExtra::grid.arrange(
  plot(epifit,
    dates = dateUSA, datelab = "3m",
    plotout = "epicurve", incibars = FALSE, themetype = "light",
    epicol = "darkgreen", cicol = rgb(0.3, 0.73, 0.3, 0.2),
    epititle = "USA smoothed epidemic curve", titlesize = 13
  ),
  plot(epifit,
    dates = dateUSA, datelab = "3m",
    plotout = "rt", theme = "light", rtcol = "black",
    titlesize = 13, Rtitle = "USA Estimated R"
  ),
  nrow = 1, ncol = 2
)

Thanks for reading. I hope you will find the method developed in the paper as useful as I do. Feel free to reach out to me and to the authors if you happen to use it for your own research.

As always, if you have a question or a suggestion related to the topic covered in this article, please add it as a comment so other readers can benefit from the discussion.