TomTom Routing

[This article was first published on R | datawookie, and kindly contributed to R-bloggers]. (You can report issue about the content on this page here)
Want to share your content on R-bloggers? click here if you have a blog, or here if you don't.

While working with the Google Mobility Data I stumbled upon the TomTom Traffic Index. I then learned that TomTom has a public API which exposes a bunch of useful and interesting data.

Seemed like another opportunity to create a smaller R package. Enter {tomtom}.

{tomtom} Package

The {tomtom} package can be found here.

Install the package.

remotes::install_github("datawookie/tomtom")

Load the package.

library(tomtom)

API Key

Getting a key for the API is quick and painless. I stored mine in the environment then retrieved it with Sys.getenv().

TOMTOM_API_KEY = Sys.getenv("TOMTOM_API_KEY")

Then use set_api_key() to let {tomtom} know about the key.

set_api_key(TOMTOM_API_KEY)

Routing

So far I’ve only implemented a function for the routing endpoint. Let’s give that a try.

First set up a series of locations on a tour spanning South Africa.

locations <- tribble(
  ~label, ~lon, ~lat,
  "Durban", 31.05, -29.88,
  "Port Elizabeth", 25.6, -33.96,
  "Cape Town", 18.42, -33.93,
  "Johannesburg", 28.05, -26.20
)

Now convert these into an sf object.

library(sf)

locations <- st_as_sf(
  locations,
  coords = c("lon", "lat"),
  remove = FALSE, crs = 4326
)
locations
Simple feature collection with 4 features and 3 fields
Geometry type: POINT
Dimension:     XY
Bounding box:  xmin: 18.42 ymin: -33.96 xmax: 31.05 ymax: -26.2
Geodetic CRS:  WGS 84
# A tibble: 4 x 4
  label            lon   lat       geometry
* <chr>          <dbl> <dbl>    <POINT [°]>
1 Durban          31.0 -29.9 (31.05 -29.88)
2 Port Elizabeth  25.6 -34.0  (25.6 -33.96)
3 Cape Town       18.4 -33.9 (18.42 -33.93)
4 Johannesburg    28.0 -26.2  (28.05 -26.2)

And then call the calculate_route() function.

routes <- calculate_route(locations)
# A tibble: 3 x 6
  route leg   distance  time delay points                   
  <fct> <fct>    <int> <int> <int> <list>                   
1 1     1       910426 37965   673 <tibble[,2] [11,125 × 2]>
2 1     2       750144 26928     0 <tibble[,2] [6,902 × 2]> 
3 1     3      1403495 46516     0 <tibble[,2] [7,365 × 2]> 

The results are broken down into legs (three legs between the four locations). The distance and time fields are in metres and seconds respectively.

Unnesting the points field we can plot out the suggested route.

Makes sense! This is both a direct and scenic way to get from Durban to Cape Town via Port Elizabeth and then return to Johannesburg. The leg between Port Elizabeth and Cape Town is particularly lovely.

Taking the (not so) Scenic Route

Is that the only way to travel between those destinations? Hell no! There are lots of options. And we can access them via {tomtom} too.

Suppose we want to consider the best route along with a few alternatives.

routes <- calculate_route(locations, alternatives = 3)
# A tibble: 12 x 5
   route leg   distance  time delay
   <fct> <fct>    <int> <int> <int>
 1 1     1       910426 37965   673
 2 1     2       750144 26928     0
 3 1     3      1403495 46517     0
 4 2     1       989397 39654     0
 5 2     2       780416 29647     0
 6 2     3      1437322 49943     0
 7 3     1       990812 43337     0
 8 3     2       839345 30480     0
 9 3     3      1591759 53469     0
10 4     1       941134 38585    83
11 4     2       867969 31817     0
12 4     3      1515709 51730     0

Now we have four routes, each of which has three legs. It’s easier to compare the routes if we summarise them.

# A tibble: 4 x 4
  route    km  hour avg_speed
  <fct> <dbl> <dbl>     <dbl>
1 1     3064.  30.9      99.0
2 2     3207.  33.1      96.8
3 3     3422.  35.4      96.8
4 4     3325.  33.9      98.0

The avg_speed field is in units of km / hour. The first route is preferred because it’s faster and significantly shorter. The other options are not too bad though.

Let’s take a look at the distance and time for each of these routes broken down by leg.

It’s apparent that the first route is both quicker and shorter across all three legs. Definitely the preferred way to get around the country if you want to save time and fuel.

Finally we’ll compare the actual routes.

Each route will present a very different view of the land. I particularly like the option which heads off into the Northern Cape on the leg from Cape Town to Johannesburg. That’s a seriously underappreciated part of the country.

To leave a comment for the author, please follow the link and comment on their blog: R | datawookie.

R-bloggers.com offers daily e-mail updates about R news and tutorials about learning R and many other topics. Click here if you're looking to post or find an R/data-science job.
Want to share your content on R-bloggers? click here if you have a blog, or here if you don't.

Never miss an update!
Subscribe to R-bloggers to receive
e-mails with the latest R posts.
(You will not see this message again.)

Click here to close (This popup will not appear again)