Site icon R-bloggers

CIS Primer Question 3.3.3

[This article was first published on Brian Callander, and kindly contributed to R-bloggers]. (You can report issue about the content on this page here)
Want to share your content on R-bloggers? click here if you have a blog, or here if you don't.

CIS Primer Question 3.3.3

Posted on 14 February, 2019 by Brian Tags: CISP chapter 3, solutions, backdoor criteria Category: causal_inference_in_statistics_primer

Here are my solutions to question 3.3.3 of Causal Inference in Statistics: a Primer (CISP). \(\DeclareMathOperator{\do}{do}\)

< !--more-->

The drug you have been assigned determines which ward you go to. Whether you get a lollipop is determined by which ward you go to and whether you show signs of depression. Depression is a symptom of certain risk factors. These risk factors, together with the drug you have been assigned, determine your capacity for recovery.

A causal model for the lollipop situation.

Since lollipop is a collider in this diagram, there are no backdoor paths from drug to recovery. In other words, it is not necessary to condition on any variables to estimate the causal effect of drug on recovery. In this case, \(\mathbb P (Y \mid \do(X)) = \mathbb P(Y \mid X)\).

If the nurse were to give out the lollipops in the day after the study, there would be no difference in the causal diagram.

Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.
To leave a comment for the author, please follow the link and comment on their blog: Brian Callander.

R-bloggers.com offers daily e-mail updates about R news and tutorials about learning R and many other topics. Click here if you're looking to post or find an R/data-science job.
Want to share your content on R-bloggers? click here if you have a blog, or here if you don't.