[This article was first published on Iegor Rudnytskyi, and kindly contributed to R-bloggers]. (You can report issue about the content on this page here)
Want to share your content on R-bloggers? click here if you have a blog, or here if you don't.
Language is a tool that allows human beings to interact and communicate with each other. The clearer we express ourselves, the better the idea is transferred from our mind to the other. The same applies to programming languages: concise, clear and consistent codes are easier to read and edit. It is especially important, if you have collaborators, which depend on your code. However, even if you don’t, keep in mind that at some point in time, you might come back to your code, for example, to fix an error. And if you did not follow consistently your coding style, reviewing your code can take much longer, than expected. In this context, taking care of your audience means to make your code as readable as possible.
Good coding style is like using correct punctuation. You can manage without
it, but it sure makes things easier to read.
Hadley Wickham
There is no such thing as a “correct” coding style, as there is no such thing as the best color. At the end of the day, coding style is a set of developers’ preferences. If you are coding alone, sticking to your coding style and being consistent is more than enough. The story is a bit different if you are working in a team: it is crucial to agree on a convention beforehand and make sure that everyone follows it.
Even though there is no official style guide, R is mature and steady enough to have an “unofficial” convention. In this post, you will learn these “unofficial” rules, their deviations, and most common styles.
Naming
Naming files
The convention actually depends on whether you develop a file for a package, or as a part of data analysis process. There are, however, common rules:
File names should use .R extension.
# Good
read.R
# Bad
read
File names should be meaningful.
# Good
model.R
# Bad
Untitled1.R
File names should not contain / and spaces. Instead, a dash (-) or underscore (_) should be used.
# Good
fir_regression.R
fir-regression.R
# Bad
fit regression.R
If the file is a part of data analysis, then it makes sense to follow the following recommendations:
File names should be lowercase. There is nothing bad in having capital case names, just bear in mind UNIX systems are case insensitive, meaning that test.R and Test.R do not differ.
# Good
analyse.R
# Bad
Analyse.R
Use meaningful verbs for file names.
# Good
validate-vbm.R
# Bad
regression.R
If files should be run in a particular order, then use ascending names.
01-read.R
02-clean.R
02-plot.R
If the file is used in a package, then slightly different rules should be folowed:
Mind special names:
AllClasses.R (or AllClass.R), a file that stores all S4 classes definitions.
AllGenerics.R (or AllGeneric.R), a file that stores all S4 generic functions.
zzz.R, a file that contains .onLoad() and friends.
If the file contains only one function, name it by the function name.
Use methods- prefix for S4 class methods.
Naming variables
Generally, names should be as short as possible, still meaningful nouns.
# Good
fit_rt
split_1
imdb_page
# Bad
fit_regression_tree
cross_validation_split_one
foo
Variable names should be typically lowercase.
# Good
event
# Bad
Event
NEVER separate words within the name by . (reserved for an S3 dispatch) or use CamelCase (reserved for S4 classes definitions). Instead, use an underscore (_).
# Good
event_window
# Bad
event.window
EventWindow
DO NOT use names of existing function and variables (especially, built-in ones).
# Bad
T <- 10 # T is a shortcut of TRUE in R
c <- "constant"
Naming functions
Many points of naming variables are similar for naming functions:
Generally, function names should be verbs.
# Good
add()
# Bad
addition()
Use . ONLY for dispatching S3 generic.
# Good
bw_test()
# Bad
bw.test()
Add the underscore (_) prefix to a standard evaluation (SE) equivalent of a function (summarize vs summarize_ ).
Naming S4 classes
Class names should be nouns in CamelCase with initial capital case letter.
Syntax
Line length
The maximum length of lines is limited to 80 characters (thanks to IBM Punch Card).
It is possible to display the margin in RStudio Source editor:
Go to Tools -> Global Options… -> Code -> Display
Click on “Show margin”
Set “Margin column” to 80
Spacing
Put spaces around all infix binary operators (=, +, *, ==, &&, <-, %*%, etc.).
# Good
x == y
a <- a ^ 2 + 1
# Bad
x==y
a<-a^2+1
Put spaces around “=” in function calls (except for Bioconductor).
# Good
mean(x = c(1, NA, 2), na.rm = TRUE)
# Bad
mean(x=c(1, NA, 2), na.rm=TRUE)
Do NOT place space for subsetting ($ and @), namespace manipulation (:: and :::), and for sequence generation (:).
# Good
car$cyl
dplyr::select
1:10
# Bad
car $cyl
dplyr:: select
1: 10
Use a space before left parentheses, except in a function call.
# Good
for (element in element_list)
if (grade == 5.5)
sum(1:10)
# Bad
for(element in element_list)
if(grade == 5.5)
sum (1:10)
No spacing around code in parenthesis or square brackets.
# Good
if (debug) message("debug mode")
species["tiger", ]
# Bad
if ( debug ) message("debug mode")
species[ "tiger" ,]
Curly braces
An opening curly brace should NEVER go on its own line and should always be followed by a new line.
# Good
if (is_used) {
# do something
}
if (is_used) {
# do something
} else {
# do something else
}
# Bad
if (is_used)
{
# do something
}
if (is_used) { # do something }
else { # do something else }
A closing curly brace should always go on its own line, unless it’s followed by else.
# Good
if (is_used) {
# do something
} else {
# do something else
}
# Bad
if (is_used) {
# do something
}
else {
# do something else
}
Always indent the code inside curly braces (see next section).
# Good
if (is_used) {
# do something
# and then something else
}
# Bad
if (is_used) {
# do something
# and then something else
}
Curly braces and new lines can be avoided, if a statement after if is very short.
# Good
if (is_used) return(rval)
Indentation
ALWAYS indent your code!
No tabs or mixes of tabs and spaces.
There are two common number of spaces for indentation: two (Hadley and others) and four (Bioconductor). My own rule of thumb: I use four spaces indentation for data analyses scripts, and two spaces while developing packages.
Choose the number of spaces of indentation upfront and stick to it. Never mix different number of spaces in one project.
To set the number of spaces in the project, go to Tools -> Global options… -> Code -> Editing. Check the following boxes: “Insert spaces for tab” (with “Tab width” equal to chosen number), “Auto-indent code after paste”, and “Vertically align arguments in auto-indent”.
Magic shortcut: Command+I (Ctrl+I for Windows/Linux) will indent a selected chunk of code. Together with Command+A (select all) it is a very powerful tool, which saves time.
Try a little exercise: paste the following code in your RStudio source editor, select it, and hit Command+I:
Very often function definition does not fit into one line. In this case, excessive arguments should be moved to a new line, starting with the opening parenthesis.
The same applies to a function call: excessive arguments should be indented where the closing parenthesis is located, if only two lines are sufficient.
plot(table(rpois(100, 5)), type = "h", col = "red", lwd = 10,
main = "rpois(100, lambda = 5)")
Otherwise, each argument can go into a separate line, starting with a new line after the opening parenthesis.
list(
mean = mean(x),
sd = sd(x),
var = var(x),
min = min(x),
max = max(x),
median = median(x)
)
If the condition in if statement expands into several lines, than each condition should end with a logical operator, NOT start with it.
# Good
if (some_very_long_name_1 == 1 &&
some_very_long_name_2 == 1 ||
some_very_long_name_3 %in% some_very_long_name_4)
# Bad
if (some_very_long_name_1 == 1
&& some_very_long_name_2 == 1
|| some_very_long_name_3 %in% some_very_long_name_4)
I know some people who are completely against it. See the next item why I believe it is better.
If the statement, which contains operators, expands into several lines, then each line should end with an operator and not begin with it. Sometimes, it makes sense to split a formula into meaningful chunks.
# Good
normal_pdf <- 1 / sqrt(2 * pi * d_sigma ^ 2) *
exp(-(x - d_mean) ^ 2 / 2 / s ^ 2)
# Bad
normal_pdf <- 1 / sqrt(2 * pi * d_sigma ^ 2)
* exp(-(x - d_mean) ^ 2 / 2 / d_sigma ^ 2)
Not only it is ugly, but also syntactically wrong. In the second case, R will consider these two lines as two distinct statements: the first line will assign the value of 1 / sqrt(2 * pi * d_sigma ^ 2) to normal_pdf, and the second line will throw an error, since * does not have the first argument.
Each grammar statement of dplyr (after %>%) and ggplot2 (after +) should start with a new line.
mtcars %>%
filter(cyl == 4) %>%
group_by(am) %>%
summarize(avg_mpg = mean(mpg))
ggplot(mtcars) +
geom_point(aes(x = mpg, y = qsec, color = factor(am))) +
geom_line(aes(x = mpg, y = qsec, color = factor(am)))
Comments
Comment your code. Always. Your collaborators and future-you will be very grateful. Comments start with # followed by space and text of the comment.
# This is a comment.
Comments should explain the why, not the what. Comments should not replicate the code by a plain langue, but rather explain the overall intention of the command.
# Good
# define iterator
i <- 1
# Bad
# set i to 1
i <- 1
Short comments can be placed on the same line of the code.
plot(price, weight) # plot a scatter chart of price and weight
To comment/uncomment selected chunk, use Command+Shift+C.
Use roxygen2 comments for a package development (i.e., #') to comment functions.
It makes sense to split the source into logical chunks by # followed by - or =.
# Read data
#---------------------------------------------------------------------------
# Tidy data
#---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Other recommendations
Use <- for assignment, NOT =.
Use library() instead of require(), unless it is a conscious choice. Package names should be characters (avoid NSE – non-standard evaluation).
# Good
library("dplyr")
# Bad
require(dplyr)
In a function call, arguments can be specified by position, complete name, or partial name. Never specify by partial name and never mix by position and complete name.
# Good
mean(x, na.rm = TRUE)
rnorm(10, 0.2, 0.3)
# Bad
mean(x, na = TRUE)
rnorm(mean = 0.2, 10, 0.3)
While developing a package, specify arguments by name.
The required (with no default value) arguments should be first, followed by optional arguments.
# Good
raise_to_power(x, power = 2.7)
# Bad
raise_to_power(power = 2.7, x)
The ... argument should either be in the beginning or in the end.
# Good
standardize(..., scale = TRUE, center = TRUE)
save_chart(chart, file, width, height, ...)
# Bad
standardize(scale = TRUE, ..., center = TRUE)
save_chart(chart, ..., file, width, height)
Good practice rule is to set default arguments inside the function using NULL idiom, and avoid dependence between arguments:
# Good
histogram <- function(x, bins = NULL) {
if (is.null(bins)) bins <- nclass.Sturges(x)
...
}
# Bad
histogram <- function(x, bins = nclass.Sturges(x)) {
...
}
Always validate arguments in a function.
While developing a package, specify the namespace of each used function, except if it is from base package.
Do NOT put more than one statement (command) per line. Do NOT use semicolon as termination of the command.
# Good
x <- 1
x <- x + 1
# Bad
x <- 1; x <- x + 1
Avoid using setwd("/Users/irudnyts/path/that/only/I/have"). Almost surely your collaborators will have different paths, which makes the project not portable. Instead, use here::here() function from here() package.
Avoid using rm(list = ls()). This statement deletes all objects from the global environment, and gives you an illusion of a fresh R start.
If you have read until this moment, you deserve a treat. There is a magic key combination Command+Shift+A that reformats selected code: add spaces and indents it. Do not use it excessively though!