Leaf Plant Classification: An Exploratory Analysis – Part 1
Want to share your content on R-bloggers? click here if you have a blog, or here if you don't.
Categories
Tags
In this post, I am going to run an exploratory analysis of the plant leaf dataset as made available by UCI Machine Learning repository at this link. The dataset is expected to comprise sixteen samples each of one-hundred plant species. Its analysis was introduced within ref. [1]. That paper describes a method designed to work in conditions of small training set size and possibly incomplete extraction of features.
This motivated separate processing of three feature types:
- shape
- texture
- margin
Those are then combined to provide an overall indication of the species (and associated probability). For an accurate description of those features, please see ref. [1] where the classification is implemented by a K-Nearest-Neighbor density estimator. Ref. [1] authors show the accuracy reached by K-Nearest-Neighbor classification for any combination of the datasets in use (see ref. [1] Table 2).
Packages
suppressPackageStartupMessages(library(caret)) suppressPackageStartupMessages(library(dplyr)) suppressPackageStartupMessages(library(ggplot2)) suppressPackageStartupMessages(library(corrplot)) suppressPackageStartupMessages(library(Hmisc))
Exploratory Analysis
Getting Data
We can download the leaf dataset as a zip file by taking advantage of the following UCI Machine Learning url.
url <- "https://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml/machine-learning-databases/00241/100%20leaves%20plant%20species.zip" temp_file <- tempfile() download.file(url, temp_file)
The files of interest are:
margin_file <- "100 leaves plant species/data_Mar_64.txt" shape_file <- "100 leaves plant species/data_Sha_64.txt" texture_file <- "100 leaves plant species/data_Tex_64.txt"
that can be so extracted.
files_to_unzip <- c(margin_file, shape_file, texture_file) unzip(temp_file, files = files_to_unzip, exdir=".", overwrite = TRUE)
We read them as CSV files. No header is originally provided.
margin_data <- read.csv(margin_file, header=FALSE, sep=",", stringsAsFactors = TRUE) shape_data <- read.csv(shape_file, header=FALSE, sep=",", stringsAsFactors = TRUE) texture_data <- read.csv(texture_file, header=FALSE, sep=",", stringsAsFactors = TRUE)
We check the number of rows and columns of the resulting datasets.
dim(margin_data) ## [1] 1600 65 dim(shape_data) ## [1] 1600 65 dim(texture_data) ## [1] 1599 65
We notice that the texture dataset has one row less. Such issue will be fixed at a later moment.
sum(complete.cases(margin_data)) == nrow(margin_data) ## [1] TRUE sum(complete.cases(shape_data)) == nrow(shape_data) ## [1] TRUE sum(complete.cases(texture_data)) == nrow(texture_data) ## [1] TRUE
No NA's value are present. Column naming is necessary due to the absence of header.
n_features <- ncol(margin_data) - 1
colnames(margin_data) <- c("species", paste("margin", as.character(1:n_features), sep=""))
margin_data$species <- factor(margin_data$species)
n_features <- ncol(shape_data) - 1
colnames(shape_data) <- c("species", paste("shape", as.character(1:n_features), sep=""))
shape_data$species <- factor(shape_data$species)
n_features <- ncol(texture_data) - 1
colnames(texture_data) <- c("species", paste("texture", as.character(1:n_features), sep=""))
texture_data$species <- factor(texture_data$species)
We count the number of entries for each species within each dataset.
margin_count <- sapply(base::split(margin_data, margin_data$species), nrow) shape_count <- sapply(base::split(shape_data, shape_data$species), nrow) texture_count <- sapply(base::split(texture_data, texture_data$species), nrow)
That in order to identify what species is associated to the missing entry inside the texture dataset.
which(margin_count != texture_count) ## Acer Campestre ## 1 which(shape_count != texture_count) ## Acer Campestre ## 1
The texture data missing entry is associated to Acer Campestre species. Adding an identifier column to all datasets to allow for datasets merging (joining).
margin_data <- mutate(margin_data, id = 1:nrow(margin_data)) shape_data <- mutate(shape_data, id = 1:nrow(shape_data)) texture_data <- mutate(texture_data, id = 1:nrow(texture_data))
Imputation
In the following, we fix the missing entry by imputation technique based on median. We suppose the missing entry is related with 16th sample of Acer Campestre texture data, which is the first plant species of our datasets. For the purpose, we take advantage of a temporary dataset made of first 15 entries and then we add such new row with median computed data. Afterwards, we “row-bind” such temporary dataset with the rest of the original texture samples.
dd <- data.frame(matrix(nrow=1, ncol = 66))
colnames(dd) <- colnames(texture_data)
dd$species <- "Acer Campestre"
dd$id <- 16
temp_texture_data <- rbind(texture_data[1:15,], dd)
features <- setdiff(colnames(temp_texture_data), c("species", "id"))
imputed <- sapply(features, function(x) { as.numeric(impute(temp_texture_data[, x], median)[16])})
temp_texture_data[16, names(imputed)] <- imputed
texture_data <- rbind(temp_texture_data, texture_data[-(1:15),])
texture_data <- mutate(texture_data, id = 1:nrow(texture_data))
dim(texture_data)
## [1] 1600 66
Here is what we got at the end.
str(margin_data) ## 'data.frame': 1600 obs. of 66 variables: ## $ species : Factor w/ 100 levels "Acer Campestre",..: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ... ## $ margin1 : num 0.00391 0.00586 0.01172 0.01367 0.00781 ... ## $ margin2 : num 0.00391 0.01367 0.00195 0.01172 0.00977 ... ## $ margin3 : num 0.0273 0.0273 0.0273 0.0371 0.0273 ... ## $ margin4 : num 0.0332 0.0254 0.0449 0.0176 0.0254 ... ## $ margin5 : num 0.00781 0.01367 0.01758 0.01172 0.00195 ... ## $ margin6 : num 0.01758 0.0293 0.04297 0.08789 0.00586 ... ## $ margin7 : num 0.0234 0.0195 0.0234 0.0234 0.0156 ... ## $ margin8 : num 0.00586 0 0 0 0 ... ## $ margin9 : num 0 0.00195 0.00391 0 0.00586 ... ## $ margin10: num 0.0156 0.0215 0.0195 0.0273 0.0176 ... .... .... str(shape_data) ## 'data.frame': 1600 obs. of 66 variables: ## $ species: Factor w/ 100 levels "Acer Campestre",..: 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 ... ## $ shape1 : num 0.000579 0.00063 0.000616 0.000613 0.000599 ... ## $ shape2 : num 0.000609 0.000661 0.000615 0.000569 0.000552 ... ## $ shape3 : num 0.000551 0.000719 0.000606 0.000564 0.000558 ... ## $ shape4 : num 0.000554 0.000651 0.000568 0.000607 0.000569 ... ## $ shape5 : num 0.000603 0.000643 0.000558 0.000643 0.000616 ... ## $ shape6 : num 0.000614 0.00064 0.000552 0.000647 0.000639 ... ## $ shape7 : num 0.000611 0.000646 0.000551 0.000663 0.000631 ... ## $ shape8 : num 0.000611 0.000624 0.000552 0.000658 0.000634 ... ## $ shape9 : num 0.000611 0.000584 0.000531 0.000635 0.000639 ... ## $ shape10: num 0.000594 0.000546 0.00053 0.0006 0.000596 ... ... ... str(texture_data) ## 'data.frame': 1600 obs. of 66 variables: ## $ species : Factor w/ 100 levels "Acer Campestre",..: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ... ## $ texture1 : num 0.02539 0.00488 0.01855 0.03516 0.03809 ... ## $ texture2 : num 0.0127 0.0186 0.0137 0.0234 0.0146 ... ## $ texture3 : num 0.003906 0.00293 0.00293 0.000977 0.003906 ... ## $ texture4 : num 0.004883 0 0.00293 0 0.000977 ... ## $ texture5 : num 0.0391 0.0693 0.0518 0.0615 0.0469 ... ## $ texture6 : num 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ... ## $ texture7 : num 0.0176 0.0137 0.0195 0.0215 0.0225 ... ## $ texture8 : num 0.0352 0.0439 0.0352 0.0615 0.0537 ... ## $ texture9 : num 0.0234 0.0264 0.0225 0.0107 0.0195 ... ## $ texture10: num 0.013672 0 0.000977 0.001953 0.004883 ... ... ...
Correlation Analysis
Since margin, shape and texture covariates are quantitative variables, it is of interest to evaluate correlation among such leaf features.
We do it by taking advantage of the correlation plot. We show that for the margin1 feature.
m_l <- split(margin_data, margin_data$species)
extract_feature <- function(m_l, feature) {
f <- lapply(m_l, function(x) { x[,feature] })
do.call(cbind, f)
}
thefeature <- "margin1"
m <- extract_feature(m_l, thefeature)
cor_mat <- cor(m)
corrplot(cor_mat, method = "circle", type="upper", tl.cex=0.3)
The correlation plot is not so easy to interpret. Therefore we implement a procedure capable to filter out the significative and most relevant correlations. At the purpose, we use an helper function named as flattenCorrMatrix as can be found in ref. [3].
flattenCorrMatrix <- function(cormat, pmat) {
ut <- upper.tri(cormat)
data.frame(
row = rownames(cormat)[row(cormat)[ut]],
column = rownames(cormat)[col(cormat)[ut]],
cor =(cormat)[ut],
p = pmat[ut]
)
}
The following utility function is capable to extract a given feature from one of the available datasets and report the flatten correlation matrix providing with the significative correlation and whose relevance is above a certain absolute value as specified by the threshold parameter.
most_correlated <- function(dataset, feature, threshold) {
m_l <- split(dataset, dataset$species)
m <- extract_feature(m_l, feature)
rcorr_m <- rcorr(m)
flat_cor <- flattenCorrMatrix(rcorr_m$r, rcorr_m$P)
attr(flat_cor, "variable") <- feature
flat_cor <- flat_cor %>% filter(p < 0.05) %>% filter(abs(cor) > threshold)
flat_cor[,-4] # getting rid of the p-value column
}
Here is what we get as correlation matrix for the margin_data dataset and the margin2 feature with a threshold equal to 0.7.
corr_margin2 <- most_correlated(margin_data, "margin2", 0.7) corr_margin2 ## row column cor ## 1 Acer Capillipes Cercis Siliquastrum 0.7038700 ## 2 Cercis Siliquastrum Cornus Controversa -0.7294585 ## 3 Acer Mono Liriodendron Tulipifera -0.7032354 ## 4 Ilex Aquifolium Morus Nigra 0.7647532 ## 5 Acer Opalus Populus Grandidentata -0.7751047 ## 6 Cercis Siliquastrum Prunus Avium 0.7295616 ## 7 Cornus Chinensis Pterocarya Stenoptera 0.7345398 ## 8 Alnus Cordata Quercus Brantii 0.7257876 ## 9 Acer Campestre Quercus Phillyraeoides -0.7150759 ## 10 Acer Circinatum Quercus Rubra 0.8082904 ## 11 Cornus Controversa Quercus Semecarpifolia -0.7089530 ## 12 Castanea Sativa Quercus Variabilis 0.7299116 ## 13 Acer Rufinerve Quercus Vulcanica 0.7180856
If we want to collect all the correlation matrixes for the margin_data, here is how we can do.
margin_names <- setdiff(colnames(margin_data), c("species", "id"))
margin_corr_l <- lapply(margin_names, function(x) {most_correlated(margin_data, x, 0.7)})
names(margin_corr_l) <- margin_names
Let us have a look at a correlation matrix as item of such list.
margin_corr_l[["margin32"]] ## row column cor ## 1 Eucalyptus Urnigera Morus Nigra 0.7623514 ## 2 Eucalyptus Urnigera Olea Europaea 1.0000000 ## 3 Morus Nigra Olea Europaea 0.7623514 ## 4 Cercis Siliquastrum Quercus Agrifolia 0.7474093 ## 5 Cornus Macrophylla Quercus Brantii 0.8071712 ## 6 Populus Adenopoda Quercus Castaneifolia 0.7092994 ## 7 Quercus Coccifera Quercus Crassipes 0.7422717 ## 8 Arundinaria Simonii Quercus Ellipsoidalis 0.7625542 ## 9 Cornus Controversa Quercus Greggii 1.0000000 ## 10 Acer Mono Quercus Phellos 0.9165285 ## 11 Quercus Crassipes Quercus Semecarpifolia 0.7682705 ## 12 Cytisus Battandieri Quercus Shumardii -0.7324311 ## 13 Quercus Ilex Quercus Suber 0.8382549 ## 14 Quercus Dolicholepis Quercus Texana 0.7090909 ## 15 Quercus Pubescens Salix Intergra 0.7603719 ## 16 Ilex Aquifolium Tilia Platyphyllos 0.7939940 ## 17 Cornus Macrophylla Viburnum Tinus 0.8451543 ## 18 Betula Pendula Viburnum x Rhytidophylloides -0.7224267 ## 19 Populus Grandidentata Zelkova Serrata 0.7453458
Here we do the same for shape and texture features datasets. For shape dataset we show shape3 feature correlation matrix result.
shape_names <- setdiff(colnames(shape_data), c("species", "id"))
shape_corr_l <- lapply(shape_names, function(x) {most_correlated(shape_data, x, 0.7)})
names(shape_corr_l) <- shape_names
shape_corr_l[["shape3"]]
## row column cor
## 1 Acer Campestre Arundinaria Simonii 0.7643580
## 2 Alnus Viridis Callicarpa Bodinieri -0.7467261
## 3 Acer Platanoids Morus Nigra -0.7674200
## 4 Magnolia Salicifolia Prunus Avium 0.7306309
## 5 Prunus Avium Pterocarya Stenoptera 0.7042563
## 6 Morus Nigra Quercus Cerris -0.7316674
## 7 Quercus Alnifolia Quercus Chrysolepis 0.7019743
## 8 Eucalyptus Glaucescens Quercus Crassifolia 0.7414744
## 9 Quercus Cerris Quercus Greggii 0.7100278
## 10 Quercus Cerris Quercus Ilex -0.8346480
## 11 Quercus Castaneifolia Quercus Phillyraeoides 0.7305218
## 12 Cornus Macrophylla Quercus Rubra 0.8231097
## 13 Morus Nigra Quercus Texana 0.7232813
## 14 Populus Nigra Quercus Trojana -0.7157611
## 15 Quercus Alnifolia Quercus Vulcanica -0.7350224
## 16 Quercus Chrysolepis Quercus Vulcanica -0.8157281
## 17 Quercus Castaneifolia Ulmus Bergmanniana 0.7747396
For texture dataset we show texture19 feature correlation matrix result.
texture_names <- setdiff(colnames(texture_data), c("species", "id"))
texture_corr_l <- lapply(texture_names, function(x) {most_correlated(texture_data, x, 0.7)})
names(texture_corr_l) <- texture_names
texture_corr_l[["texture19"]]
## row column cor
## 1 Acer Palmatum Callicarpa Bodinieri -0.8069241
## 2 Cornus Macrophylla Ilex Aquifolium 0.7243966
## 3 Eucalyptus Glaucescens Liriodendron Tulipifera 0.7609341
## 4 Eucalyptus Urnigera Lithocarpus Cleistocarpus 0.8353815
## 5 Acer Mono Olea Europaea 0.8007114
## 6 Alnus Rubra Olea Europaea 0.7121676
## 7 Liquidambar Styraciflua Quercus Chrysolepis 0.7252803
## 8 Magnolia Heptapeta Quercus Coccinea 0.7512588
## 9 Magnolia Heptapeta Quercus Crassifolia 0.8270324
## 10 Quercus Coccinea Quercus Crassifolia 0.7479191
## 11 Lithocarpus Cleistocarpus Quercus Crassipes 0.7031255
## 12 Cotinus Coggygria Quercus Palustris 0.7104135
## 13 Alnus Sieboldiana Quercus Pyrenaica 0.7401955
## 14 Ilex Cornuta Quercus Trojana 0.7432011
## 15 Morus Nigra Quercus Trojana 0.7238492
## 16 Quercus Greggii Quercus x Hispanica 0.7396316
## 17 Quercus Pyrenaica Sorbus Aria 0.7345942
## 18 Eucalyptus Neglecta Tilia Oliveri 0.7565882
## 19 Prunus Avium Viburnum x Rhytidophylloides -0.7451209
## 20 Alnus Viridis Zelkova Serrata -0.7052669
Furthermore, by collecting the number of rows of such correlation matrixes, the most correlated features among the one hundred leaf plant species can be put in evidence.
t <- sapply(margin_corr_l, nrow) margin_c <- data.frame(feature = names(t), value = t) t <- sapply(shape_corr_l, nrow) shape_c <- data.frame(feature = names(t), value = t) t <- sapply(texture_corr_l, nrow) texture_c <- data.frame(feature = names(t), value = t) ggplot(data = margin_c, aes(x=feature, y=value, fill = feature)) + theme_bw() + theme(legend.position = "none") + geom_histogram(stat='identity') + coord_flip()
ggplot(data = margin_c, aes(x=feature, y=value, fill = feature)) + theme_bw() + theme(legend.position = "none") + geom_histogram(stat='identity') + coord_flip()
ggplot(data = margin_c, aes(x=feature, y=value, fill = feature)) + theme_bw() + theme(legend.position = "none") + geom_histogram(stat='identity') + coord_flip()
Boxplots are shown to highlight differences in features among species. At the purpose, we define the following utility function.
species_boxplot <- function(dataset, variable) {
p <- ggplot(data = dataset, aes(x = species, y = eval(parse(text=variable)), fill= species)) + theme_bw() + theme(legend.position = "none") + geom_boxplot() + ylab(parse(text=variable))
p <- p + theme(axis.text.x = element_text(angle = 90, hjust = 1)) + ggtitle(paste(variable, "among species", sep = " "))
p
}
Margin feature boxplot
For each margin feature, a boxplot as shown below can be generated. Herein, the boxplot associated to the margin1 feature.
species_boxplot(margin_data, "margin1")
If you are interested in having a summary report, you may take advantage of the following line of code.
with(margin_data, tapply(margin1, species, summary))
Shape feature boxplot
We show the boxplot for shape features by considering the shape20 as example.
species_boxplot(shape_data, "shape20")
Texture feature boxplot
We show the boxplot for texture features by considering the texture31 as example.
species_boxplot(texture_data, "texture31")
Saving the current enviroment for further analysis.
save.image(file='PlantLeafEnvironment.RData')
References
- Charles Mallah, James Cope and James Orwell, “PLANT LEAF CLASSIFICATION USING PROBABILISTIC INTEGRATION OF SHAPE, TEXTURE AND MARGIN FEATURES”, link
- 100 Plant Leaf Dataset
- Correlation Matrix: a quick start guide
- Proteomics Data Analysis (1/3): Data Acquisition and Cleaning
- Accessing Web Data (JSON) in R using httr
- Zomato Web Scraping with BeautifulSoup in Python
- Processing Huge Dataset with Python
- Finding the Popular Indian Blogging Platform by Web Scraping in Python
Related Post
R-bloggers.com offers daily e-mail updates about R news and tutorials about learning R and many other topics. Click here if you're looking to post or find an R/data-science job.
Want to share your content on R-bloggers? click here if you have a blog, or here if you don't.