Want to share your content on R-bloggers? click here if you have a blog, or here if you don't.
This was just going to be a few Tweets but it ended up being a bit of a rollercoaster of learning for me, and I haven’t blogged in far too long, so I’m writing it up quickly as a ‘hey look at that’ example for newcomers.
I’ve been working on the ‘merging data’ part of my book and, as I do when I’m writing this stuff, I had a play around with some examples to see if there was anything funky going on if a reader was to try something slightly different. I’ve been using dplyr for the examples after being thoroughly convinced on Twitter to do so. It’s going well. Mostly.
## if you haven't already done so, load dplyr library(dplyr)
My example involved joining together two tibbles containing text values. Nothing too surprising. I wondered though; do numbers behave the way I expect? Now, a big rule in programming is ‘thou shalt not compare numbers’, and it holds especially true when numbers aren’t exactly integers. This is because representing non-integers is hard, and what you see on the screen isn’t always what the computer sees internally.
Thou shalt not compare numbers
If I had a tibble where the column I would use to join had integers
dataA <- tribble(
~X, ~Y,
0L, 100L,
1L, 101L,
2L, 102L,
3L, 103L
)
dataA
## # A tibble: 4 x 2
## X Y
## <int> <int>
## 1 0 100
## 2 1 101
## 3 2 102
## 4 3 103
and another tibble with numeric in that column
dataB <- tribble(
~X, ~Z,
0, 1000L,
1, 1001L,
2, 1002L,
3, 1003L
)
dataB
## # A tibble: 4 x 2
## X Z
## <dbl> <int>
## 1 0 1000
## 2 1 1001
## 3 2 1002
## 4 3 1003
would they still join?
full_join(dataA, dataB) ## Joining, by = "X" ## # A tibble: 4 x 3 ## X Y Z ## <dbl> <int> <int> ## 1 0 100 1000 ## 2 1 101 1001 ## 3 2 102 1002 ## 4 3 103 1003
Okay, sure. R treats these as close enough to join. I mean, maybe it shouldn’t, but we’ll work with what we have. R doesn’t always think these are equal
identical(0L, 0) ## [1] FALSE identical(2L, 2) ## [1] FALSE
though sometimes it does
0L == 0 ## [1] TRUE 2L == 2 ## [1] TRUE
(== coerces types before comparing). Well, what if one of these just ‘looks like’ the other value (can be coerced to the same?)
dataC <- tribble(
~X, ~Z,
"0", 100L,
"1", 101L,
"2", 102L,
"3", 103L
)
dataC
## # A tibble: 4 x 2
## X Z
## <chr> <int>
## 1 0 100
## 2 1 101
## 3 2 102
## 4 3 103
full_join(dataA, dataC)
## Joining, by = "X"
## Error: Can't join on 'X' x 'X' because of incompatible types (character / integer)
That’s probably wise. Of course, R is perfectly happy with things like
"2":"5" ## [1] 2 3 4 5
and == thinks that’s fine
"0" == 0L ## [1] TRUE "2" == 2L ## [1] TRUE
but who am I to argue?
Anyway, how far apart can those integers and numerics be before they aren’t able to be joined? What if we shift the ‘numeric in name only’ values away from the integers just a teensy bit? .Machine$double.eps is the built-in value for ‘the tiniest number you can produce’. On this system it’s 2.22044610^{-16}.
dataBeps <- tribble(
~X, ~Z,
0 + .Machine$double.eps, 1000L,
1 + .Machine$double.eps, 1001L,
2 + .Machine$double.eps, 1002L,
3 + .Machine$double.eps, 1003L
)
dataBeps
## # A tibble: 4 x 2
## X Z
## <dbl> <int>
## 1 2.22e-16 1000
## 2 1.00e+ 0 1001
## 3 2.00e+ 0 1002
## 4 3.00e+ 0 1003
Well, that’s… weirder. The values offset from 2 and 3 joined fine, but the 0 and 1 each got multiple copies since R thinks they’re different. What if we offset a little further?
dataB2eps <- tribble(
~X, ~Z,
0 + 2*.Machine$double.eps, 1000L,
1 + 2*.Machine$double.eps, 1001L,
2 + 2*.Machine$double.eps, 1002L,
3 + 2*.Machine$double.eps, 1003L
)
dataB2eps
## # A tibble: 4 x 2
## X Z
## <dbl> <int>
## 1 4.44e-16 1000
## 2 1.00e+ 0 1001
## 3 2.00e+ 0 1002
## 4 3.00e+ 0 1003
That’s what I’d expect. So, what’s going on? Why does R think those numbers are the same? Let’s check with a minimal example: For each of the values 0:4, let’s compare that integer with the same offset by .Machine$double.eps
library(purrr) ## for the 'thou shalt not for-loop' crowd map_lgl(0:4, ~ as.integer(.x) == as.integer(.x) + .Machine$double.eps) ## [1] FALSE FALSE TRUE TRUE TRUE
And there we have it. Some sort of relative difference tolerance maybe? In any case, the general rule to live by is to never compare floats. Add this to the list of reasons why.
For what it’s worth, I’m sure this is hardly a surprising detail to the dplyr team. They’ve dealt with things like this for a long time and I’m sure it was much worse before those changes.
Update: As noted in the comments, R does have a way to check if things are ‘nearly equal’ (within some specified tolerance) via all.equal()
purrr::map_lgl(0:4, ~all.equal(.x, .x + .Machine$double.eps)) ## [1] TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE
However, this does require the user to either specify the exact tolerance under which they consider two numbers ‘equal’, or to use the default (which, judging by the source of all.equal.numeric() is sqrt(.Machine$double.eps) or around 1.490116110^{-8} on this system). This means that numbers can be ‘quite’ different (depending on what’s an important difference) and still considered equal
purrr::map_lgl(0:4, ~ all.equal(.x, .x + 1e-8)) ## [1] TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE
< details>
< summary> devtools::session_info()
## ─ Session info ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── ## setting value ## version R version 3.5.2 (2018-12-20) ## os Pop!_OS 19.04 ## system x86_64, linux-gnu ## ui X11 ## language en_AU:en ## collate en_AU.UTF-8 ## ctype en_AU.UTF-8 ## tz Australia/Adelaide ## date 2019-08-13 ## ## ─ Packages ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── ## package * version date lib source ## assertthat 0.2.1 2019-03-21 [1] CRAN (R 3.5.2) ## backports 1.1.4 2019-04-10 [1] CRAN (R 3.5.2) ## blogdown 0.14.1 2019-08-11 [1] Github (rstudio/blogdown@be4e91c) ## bookdown 0.12 2019-07-11 [1] CRAN (R 3.5.2) ## callr 3.3.1 2019-07-18 [1] CRAN (R 3.5.2) ## cli 1.1.0 2019-03-19 [1] CRAN (R 3.5.2) ## crayon 1.3.4 2017-09-16 [1] CRAN (R 3.5.1) ## desc 1.2.0 2018-05-01 [1] CRAN (R 3.5.1) ## devtools 2.1.0 2019-07-06 [1] CRAN (R 3.5.2) ## digest 0.6.20 2019-07-04 [1] CRAN (R 3.5.2) ## dplyr * 0.8.3 2019-07-04 [1] CRAN (R 3.5.2) ## evaluate 0.14 2019-05-28 [1] CRAN (R 3.5.2) ## fansi 0.4.0 2018-10-05 [1] CRAN (R 3.5.1) ## fs 1.3.1 2019-05-06 [1] CRAN (R 3.5.2) ## glue 1.3.1 2019-03-12 [1] CRAN (R 3.5.2) ## htmltools 0.3.6 2017-04-28 [1] CRAN (R 3.5.1) ## knitr 1.24 2019-08-08 [1] CRAN (R 3.5.2) ## magrittr 1.5 2014-11-22 [1] CRAN (R 3.5.1) ## memoise 1.1.0 2017-04-21 [1] CRAN (R 3.5.1) ## pillar 1.4.2 2019-06-29 [1] CRAN (R 3.5.2) ## pkgbuild 1.0.4 2019-08-05 [1] CRAN (R 3.5.2) ## pkgconfig 2.0.2 2018-08-16 [1] CRAN (R 3.5.1) ## pkgload 1.0.2 2018-10-29 [1] CRAN (R 3.5.1) ## prettyunits 1.0.2 2015-07-13 [1] CRAN (R 3.5.1) ## processx 3.4.1 2019-07-18 [1] CRAN (R 3.5.2) ## ps 1.3.0 2018-12-21 [1] CRAN (R 3.5.1) ## purrr * 0.3.2 2019-03-15 [1] CRAN (R 3.5.2) ## R6 2.4.0 2019-02-14 [1] CRAN (R 3.5.1) ## Rcpp 1.0.2 2019-07-25 [1] CRAN (R 3.5.2) ## remotes 2.1.0 2019-06-24 [1] CRAN (R 3.5.2) ## rlang 0.4.0 2019-06-25 [1] CRAN (R 3.5.2) ## rmarkdown 1.14 2019-07-12 [1] CRAN (R 3.5.2) ## rprojroot 1.3-2 2018-01-03 [1] CRAN (R 3.5.1) ## sessioninfo 1.1.1 2018-11-05 [1] CRAN (R 3.5.1) ## stringi 1.4.3 2019-03-12 [1] CRAN (R 3.5.2) ## stringr 1.4.0 2019-02-10 [1] CRAN (R 3.5.1) ## testthat 2.2.1 2019-07-25 [1] CRAN (R 3.5.2) ## tibble * 2.1.3 2019-06-06 [1] CRAN (R 3.5.2) ## tidyselect 0.2.5 2018-10-11 [1] CRAN (R 3.5.1) ## usethis 1.5.1 2019-07-04 [1] CRAN (R 3.5.2) ## utf8 1.1.4 2018-05-24 [1] CRAN (R 3.5.1) ## vctrs 0.2.0 2019-07-05 [1] CRAN (R 3.5.2) ## withr 2.1.2 2018-03-15 [1] CRAN (R 3.5.1) ## xfun 0.8 2019-06-25 [1] CRAN (R 3.5.2) ## yaml 2.2.0 2018-07-25 [1] CRAN (R 3.5.1) ## zeallot 0.1.0 2018-01-28 [1] CRAN (R 3.5.2) ## ## [1] /home/jono/R/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-library/3.5 ## [2] /usr/local/lib/R/site-library ## [3] /usr/lib/R/site-library ## [4] /usr/lib/R/library
R-bloggers.com offers daily e-mail updates about R news and tutorials about learning R and many other topics. Click here if you're looking to post or find an R/data-science job.
Want to share your content on R-bloggers? click here if you have a blog, or here if you don't.