[This article was first published on Econometrics Beat: Dave Giles' Blog, and kindly contributed to R-bloggers]. (You can report issue about the content on this page here)
Want to share your content on R-bloggers? click here if you have a blog, or here if you don't.
Want to share your content on R-bloggers? click here if you have a blog, or here if you don't.
Five years ago I wrote a post titled, “Beware of Econometricians Bearing Spreadsheets“.
The take-away message from that post was simple: there’s considerable, well-documented, evidence that spreadsheets are very, very, dangerous when it comes to statistical calculations. That is, if you care about getting the right answers!
Read that post, and the associated references, and you’ll see what I mean.
(You might also ask yourself, why would I pay big bugs for commercial software that is of questionable quality when I can use high-quality statistical software such as R, for free?)
This week, a piece in The Economist looks at the shocking record of publications in genomics that fall prey to spreadsheet errors. It’s a sorry tale, to be sure. I strongly recommend that you take a look.
Yes, any software can be mis-used. Anyone can make a mistake. We all know that. However, it’s not a good situation when a careful and well-informed researcher ends up making blunders just because the software they trust simply isn’t up to snuff!
To leave a comment for the author, please follow the link and comment on their blog: Econometrics Beat: Dave Giles' Blog.
R-bloggers.com offers daily e-mail updates about R news and tutorials about learning R and many other topics. Click here if you're looking to post or find an R/data-science job.
Want to share your content on R-bloggers? click here if you have a blog, or here if you don't.