Flowers Fractals, or Fractal Flowers

[This article was first published on Daniel's Blog, and kindly contributed to R-bloggers]. (You can report issue about the content on this page here)
Want to share your content on R-bloggers? click here if you have a blog, or here if you don't.

Last week I attended a “Flower Festival” in Joinville, where I had opportunity to admire several of among the most beautiful and awarded flowers, orchids, and decoration plants. Surprisingly, though, I never had thought on flowers like fractals the way I did this time.

Flower

Introduction

Fractals attract lots of interest, especially from mathematicians who actually spend time studying about their structures and combinations. But what makes something a fractal? A fractal is defined as an object that displays self-similarity on all scales. But the object doesn’t need to have exactly the same structure at all scales only the same sort of structure must be visible or recognizable any how.

Flower

The structure or the equation that defines a fractal is most of the time very simple. For instance, the formula for the famous Mandelbrot is [ z_{n+1}=z_n^2+c ].

How can we start?

We start by plugging in a constant value for $c$, $z$ can start at zero. After one iteration, the equation gives us a new value for $z$; then we plug this back into the equation at old $z$ and iterate it again, it can proceed infinitely.

As a very simple example, let’s start this with c = 1.

[ z_{1} = z_{02} + c= 0 + 1 = 1 ] [ z_{2} = z_{12} + c = 1 + 1 = 2 ] [ z_{3} = z_{22} + c = 4 + 1 = 5 ]

Graphing these results against n would create an upward parabolic curve because the numbers increase exponentially (to infinity). But if we start with c = -1 for instance, $z$ will behave completely different. That is, it will oscillate between two fixed points as:

[ z_{1} = z_{02} + c= 0 + -1 = -1 ] [ z_{2} = z_{12} + c = 1 + (-1) = 0 ] [ z_{3} = z_{22} + c = 0 + (- 1) = -1 ] [ z_{4} = z_{32} + c = 1 + (- 1) = 0 ]

And this movement back and forth will continue forever as we can imagine. I figured out, that the Mandelbrot set is made up of all the values for $z$ that stay finite, thus a solution such as the first example for $c = 1$ is not valid and will be thrown out because $z$ in those cases goes to infinity and Mandelbrot lives in a finite world. The following is an example of such set.

Mandelbroat

The script for this set:

library(caTools) 
# caTools is handy because it provides write.gif function

cols <- colorRampPalette(c("#00007F", "brown", "blue", "#007FFF", "green", "#7FFF7F", "yellow", "#FF7F00", "red", "#7F0000", "magenta"))
m <- 1200 # define size
C <- complex( real=rep(seq(-1.8,0.6, length.out=m), each=m ),
              imag=rep(seq(-1.2,1.2, length.out=m), m ) )
C <- matrix(C,m,m) # reshape as square matrix
Z <- 0 # initialize Z to zero
X <- array(0, c(m,m,20)) # initialize output 3D array
for (k in 1:20) { # loop with 20 iterations
    Z <- Z^2+C # The equation
    X[,,k] <- exp(-abs(Z)) # capture results
}
write.gif(X, "Mandelbrot.gif", col=cols, delay=1000)

To leave a comment for the author, please follow the link and comment on their blog: Daniel's Blog.

R-bloggers.com offers daily e-mail updates about R news and tutorials about learning R and many other topics. Click here if you're looking to post or find an R/data-science job.
Want to share your content on R-bloggers? click here if you have a blog, or here if you don't.

Never miss an update!
Subscribe to R-bloggers to receive
e-mails with the latest R posts.
(You will not see this message again.)

Click here to close (This popup will not appear again)