[This article was first published on Thinking inside the box , and kindly contributed to R-bloggers]. (You can report issue about the content on this page here)
Want to share your content on R-bloggers? click here if you have a blog, or here if you don't.
The recent releases of Rcpp 0.10.2
and RcppClassic 0.9.3
had one more repercussion. On that dreaded OS, the linker no longer wanted to instantiate a symbol present in both packages; seems to me that
the linker in the other two OSs is a little smarter. Anyway — I didn’t fight this but at long last moved all remnands of the
long-deprecated older Rcpp API (which is still maintained by package Want to share your content on R-bloggers? click here if you have a blog, or here if you don't.
RcppClassic) out of package
RcppExamples and into a new package
RcppClassicExamples.
And the updated version 0.1.5 of the RcppExamples
package appeared on CRAN and has now been joined by the initial version 0.1.0 of the new
package RcppClassicExamples. No code changed were made; manual pages and descriptions where brushed up and that is about it.
Thanks to
CRANberries, you can also look at a
diff to the previous release 0.1.4 of RcppExamples.
Questions, comments etc should go to the
rcpp-devel mailing list
off the R-Forge page.
To leave a comment for the author, please follow the link and comment on their blog: Thinking inside the box .
R-bloggers.com offers daily e-mail updates about R news and tutorials about learning R and many other topics. Click here if you're looking to post or find an R/data-science job.
Want to share your content on R-bloggers? click here if you have a blog, or here if you don't.