Want to share your content on R-bloggers? click here if you have a blog, or here if you don't.
In “Fitting Distributions with R” Vito Ricci writes;
“Fitting distributions consists in finding a mathematical function which represents in a good way a statistical variable. A statistician often is facing with this problem: he has some observations of a quantitative character and he wishes to test if those observations, being a sample of an unknown population, belong from a population with a pdf (probability density function) , where is a vector of parameters to estimate with available data.
We can identify 4 steps in fitting distributions:
- Model/function choice: hypothesize families of distributions;
- Estimate parameters;
- Evaluate quality of fit;
- Goodness of fit statistical tests.”
In SAS this can be done by using proc capability
whereas in R we can do the same thing by using fdistrplus
and some other packages. In this post I will try to compare the procedures in R and SAS.
< !--more-->
Following code chunk creates 10,000 observations from normal distribution with a mean of 10 and standard deviation of 5 and then gives the summary of the data and plots a histogram of it.
If we import the data we created in R into SAS and run the following code;
PROC CAPABILITY; HISTOGRAM x / NORMAL; RUN;
SAS gives us the following results;
- Moments
- Basic Statistical Measures (Location and Variability)
- Tests for Location
- Observed Quantiles
- Extreme Observations
- Histogram
- Parameter Estimates
- Goodness-of-Fit Test Results
- Estimated Quantiles
We can obtain same results in R by using e1071
, raster
, plotrix
, stats
, fitdistrplus
and nortest
packages.
1. Moments
N :
Sum Weights : A numeric variable can be specified as a weight variable to weight the values of the analysis variable. The default weight variable is defined to be 1 for each observation. This field is the sum of observation values for the weight variable. In our case, since we didn’t specify a weight variable, SAS uses the default weight variable. Therefore, the sum of weight is the same as the number of observations. (Source)
Mean :
Sum Observations :
Std Deviation :
Skewness :
Kurtosis :
Uncorrected SS : Sum of squared data values. (Source)
Corrected SS : The sum of squared distance of data values from the mean. (Source)
Coeff Variation : The ratio of the standard deviation to the mean. (Source)
Std Error Mean : The estimated standard deviation of the sample mean. (Source)
2. Basic Statistical Measures (Location and Variability)
Range :
Interquartile Range :
3. Tests for Location
Student’s t : Skipped this part
Sign : Skipped this part
Signed Rank :
4. Observed Quantiles
Signed Rank :
5. Extreme Observations : Skipped this part
6. Histogram
6. Parameter Estimates
Mean (Mu) :
Std Dev (Sigma) :
7. Goodness-of-Fit Test Results
Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Cramer-von Mises, and Anderson-Darling
or
Kolmogorov-Smirnov :
Cramer-von Mises :
Anderson-Darling :
Chi-Square :
8. Estimated Quantiles : Skipped this part
We can change the commands to fit other distributions. This is as simple as changing normal
to something like beta(theta = SOME NUMBER, scale = SOME NUMBER)
or weibull
in SAS. Whereas in R one may change the name of the distribution in normal.fit <- fitdist(x,"norm")
command to the desired distribution name. While fitting densities you should take the properties of specific distributions into account. For example, Beta distribution is defined between 0 and 1. So you may need to rescale your data in order to fit the Beta distribution.
R-bloggers.com offers daily e-mail updates about R news and tutorials about learning R and many other topics. Click here if you're looking to post or find an R/data-science job.
Want to share your content on R-bloggers? click here if you have a blog, or here if you don't.