[This article was first published on Xi'an's Og » R, and kindly contributed to R-bloggers]. (You can report issue about the content on this page here)
Want to share your content on R-bloggers? click here if you have a blog, or here if you don't.
Want to share your content on R-bloggers? click here if you have a blog, or here if you don't.
> test=NULL
> for (i in 1:10){
+ if (i%%2!=0){
+ test=c(test,i)
+ i=i+2}}
> test
[1] 1 3 5 7 9
I was expecting the same output as
> test=NULL > i=1 > while (i test [1] 1 5 9
So this means that the dummy index in R “for” loops cannot be tweaked that easily. I seem to remember doing this kind of (dirty) tricks with earlier versions… Now, Alessandra and Robin think this is a good thing that the for loop is robust against this kind of non-sense, so I may be a minority in complaining about this lack of control [for me, if not for for].
Filed under: R, University life Tagged: dummy variable, for loop, loops, R
To leave a comment for the author, please follow the link and comment on their blog: Xi'an's Og » R.
R-bloggers.com offers daily e-mail updates about R news and tutorials about learning R and many other topics. Click here if you're looking to post or find an R/data-science job.
Want to share your content on R-bloggers? click here if you have a blog, or here if you don't.