Want to share your content on R-bloggers? click here if you have a blog, or here if you don't.
I should have probably figured this out a long time ago, but as I get deeper into programming with R, I am finding the need to remove all rows from a dataframe. I was making this alot harder than it had to be.
your.df<- your.df[which(is.na(your.df$text)), ]
Replace your.df with, your dataframe and you are good to go. For the longest time, everytime I saw an example or an answer that included which, I stayed clear. I couldn’t wrap my head how to use it.
In my own words, it returns a logical TRUE/FALSE for every “thing” in an expression. If using Excel or SPSS, think that it returns a true or false for every row in a workbook or SPSS dataset. That is fairly straightforward, but when would you use it?
If you recall, when selecting rows in a data frame using an expression (d f[ df$a == b, ]), the evaluation of the function returns a TRUE or FALSE, and only the rows with TRUE are returned. Coming from SPSS, if you select variables through the dialog box, you see a variable that is filter_$ added to the dataset, and it contains the values 0,1. This is the same thing, you just don’t ‘see’ it because R doesn’t have a native GUI. Until now, I had never once thought to tell R to return 0 rows.
I had always thought the best approach would have been something along the lines of
df$col <- NULL
which deletes the column ‘col’ from your dataset.
Sadly, I previously was using a ‘for loop’ to iterate over every row in a dataframe and do needless operations.
I have a love/hate relationship with R right now.
Filed under: How-to, R, SPSS Tagged: Dataframe, R, SPSS, Tutorial
R-bloggers.com offers daily e-mail updates about R news and tutorials about learning R and many other topics. Click here if you're looking to post or find an R/data-science job.
Want to share your content on R-bloggers? click here if you have a blog, or here if you don't.