[This article was first published on Thinking inside the box , and kindly contributed to R-bloggers]. (You can report issue about the content on this page here)
Want to share your content on R-bloggers? click here if you have a blog, or here if you don't.
Following up on my
initial post announcing gcbd,
here is a brief note on a new version. The initial post announced version
0.2.2 which was the first
CRAN version of gcbd.
I updated to 0.2.3 when I made the
aforementioned first blog post
about gcbd with the lattice plot of the BLAS and GPU benchmark results across
six different implementations (from reference BLAS to two Atlas versions,
Goto, MKL and a GPU-based one).
Want to share your content on R-bloggers? click here if you have a blog, or here if you don't.
There is now a new version 0.2.4 of gcbd on CRAN. I revised the paper ever so slightly based on some more feedback, and focussed the results sections by concentrating on just the log-axes lattice blot and the corresponding lattice plot of raw results—where the y-axis is capped at 30 seconds:
This chart–in levels rather than using logarithmic axes is done here–nicely illustrates just how large the performance difference can be for for matrix multiplication and LU decomposition. QR and SVD are closer but accelerated BLAS libraries still win. GPUs can be compelling for some tasks and large sizes.
More discussion is still available in the paper which is also included in the gcbd package for R.
To leave a comment for the author, please follow the link and comment on their blog: Thinking inside the box .
R-bloggers.com offers daily e-mail updates about R news and tutorials about learning R and many other topics. Click here if you're looking to post or find an R/data-science job.
Want to share your content on R-bloggers? click here if you have a blog, or here if you don't.