Le Monde rank test (cont’d)

Posted on April 5, 2010 by xi'an in R bloggers | 0 Comments

[This article was first published on Xi'an's Og » R, and kindly contributed to R-bloggers]. (You can report issue about the content on this page here)

Want to share your content on R-bloggers? click here if you have a blog, or here if you don't.

Following a comment from efrique pointing out that this statistic is called Spearman footrule, I want to clarify the notation in

$mathfrak{M}_n = sum_{i=1}^n |r^x_i-r^y_i|,,$

namely (a) that the ranks of $x_i$ and $y_i$ are considered for the whole sample, i.e.

${r^x_1,ldots,r^x_n,r^y_1,ldots,r^y_n} = {1,ldots,2n}$

instead of being computed separately for the $x$ ‘s and the $y$ ‘s, and then (b) that the ranks are reordered for each group (meaning that the groups could be of different sizes). This statistics is therefore different from the Spearman footrule studied by Persi Diaconis and R. Graham in a 1977 JRSS paper,

$mathfrak{D}_ n = sum_{i=1}^n |pi(i)-sigma(i)|,,$

where $pi$ and $sigma$ are permutations from $mathfrak{S}_n$ . The mean of $mathfrak{D}_ n$ is approximately $n^2/3$ . I mistakenly referred to Spearman’s $rho$ rank correlation test in the previous post. It is actually much more related to the Siegel-Tukey test, even though I think there exists a non-parametric test of iid-ness for paired observations… The $x$ ‘s and the $y$ ‘s are thus not paired, despite what I wrote previously. This distance must be related to some non-parametric test for checking the equality of location parameters.