[This article was first published on Statistics, R, Graphics and Fun » R Language, and kindly contributed to R-bloggers]. (You can report issue about the content on this page here)
Want to share your content on R-bloggers? click here if you have a blog, or here if you don't.
Motivated by the excellent R package Want to share your content on R-bloggers? click here if you have a blog, or here if you don't.
pgfSweave
, I begin to notice the families in my graphs when writing Sweave documents. The default family for PDF graphs is Helvetica
, which is, in most cases (I think), inconsistent with the LaTeX styles. Some common families are listed in ?postscript
, and we can take a look at them by:
for (f in c("AvantGarde", "Bookman", "Courier", "Helvetica", "Helvetica-Narrow", "NewCenturySchoolbook", "Palatino", "Times")) { pdf.options(family = f) pdf(paste(f, ".pdf", sep = "")) set.seed(123) plot(rnorm(25), pch = 1:25, xlab = "xlab family", ylab = "ylab ", main = paste("Font Families in R (PDF):", f)) text(13, 0, "Text in the Middle") mtext(sprintf("pdf.options(family = \"%s\")", f), side = 4) dev.off() }
Here is a merged PDF containing the above single PDF files:
It seems that "Bookman"
, "NewCenturySchoolbook"
, "Palatino"
and "Times"
can be better choices when using Sweave because they are serif s, which are usually more consistent with LaTeX PDF.
Related Posts
To leave a comment for the author, please follow the link and comment on their blog: Statistics, R, Graphics and Fun » R Language.
R-bloggers.com offers daily e-mail updates about R news and tutorials about learning R and many other topics. Click here if you're looking to post or find an R/data-science job.
Want to share your content on R-bloggers? click here if you have a blog, or here if you don't.